Tag Archives: Peritoneal dialysis

The Treatment of Kidney Failure in New Zealand

I am delighted to introduce a guest post from Dr Kelvin Lynn. Dr Lynn worked as a Nephrologist at Christchurch Hospital for 35 years and retired in 2015.  He is the lead author for a book just published:

The Treatment of Kidney Failure in New Zealand

Authors: Kelvin L Lynn, Adrian L Buttimore, Peter J Hatfield, Martin R Wallace 2018

ISBN PDF – 978-0-473-45293-3

Available at no charge at www.kidneys.co.nz/Kidney-History from 16 October 2018.

Dr Kelvin Lynn and his fellow editors tell the history of the treatment of people with kidney failure in New Zealand; beginning in the early 1950s this story encompasses remarkable experiences of patients and their families, and of the contributions made by dedicated health professionals. It also reveals the challenges and ethics of meeting an ever-increasing demand for treatment.

New Zealand doctors were early adopters of new dialysis technology. The first peritoneal dialysis (PD treatment in New Zealand occurred at Wellington Hospital in 1954. Two young doctors tried a recently reported treatment using homemade equipment – classic Number 8 wire technology. Dr Neil Turnbull was a medical registrar in 1954 when he admitted a pale, vomiting, dehydrated 24-year-old woman who had not passed urine for the past nine days. Fifteen days before admission she had tried to terminate an unwanted pregnancy by infusing a Dettol solution into her cervical canal. In spite of rehydration with blood and five per cent glucose she became comatose. It was then that pathology registrar, Dr Dave Reid, suggested trying PD, which he had recently read about in the New England Journal of Medicine.  After mixing 20 litres of a glucose solution in sterilised glass bottles they had to stop as the solution had caramelised. They supposed the autoclave (steriliser) had been too hot and were proved right when after the autoclave temperature was reduced the new glucose solution remained clear. This was not the end of their technical problems, however, for after running two litres of the solution through the polythene tube that they had inserted into the right iliac fossa with a trocar and cannula, there was no drainage. Undeterred, they pulled the tube out and established good drainage by pricking holes in the tubing with a hot 22-gauge needle. After three days of peritoneal dialysis the patient began passing increasing volumes of urine and then regained consciousness. When last seen by Turnbull in 1992, she had normal renal function.

This book recounts the contribution of doctors, nurses, technicians, and patients and their families to the story of kidney treatment in New Zealand. Social and political changes in our country since the 1950s have critically influenced the development of treatment services for New Zealanders with kidney failure. The improvements in technology and community expectations regarding access to treatment over the past 50 years are discussed as well as the issues for patients and families coming to terms with kidney failure and its treatment.

This story is illustrated with many anecdotes and historical photographs.

  • The experience of living a life with kidney failure is recounted from patient interviews.These stories are a testament to the bravery and determination of these individuals. Rob Brydon’s story demonstrated what ordinary people were able to do in the face of kidney failure.

Rob began home haemodialysis on 31 August 1976 just after getting married. After two failed transplants, the second from his brother Nev, he remains on HHD over 40 years later.  Most of this time, he worked full-time. Following redundancy in 1993, he started his own painting business which he ran for ten years until he had both legs amputated below the knee, bringing this to an end. Rob had a profound anaemia as the result of having both his kidneys removed to control his high blood pressure. He built his own house while his haemoglobin concentration was only 40 to 50 g/L, and subsequently Rob was one of the first patients in New Zealand to benefit from erythropoietin treatment for renal anaemia. Rob remembers the burden of having to reuse dialysers and blood lines and the unpleasantness of using formalin for sterilisation. His advice to other dialysis patients is to “try to keep your life as normal as possible.”

  • There are chapters devoted to the professional development of renal nurses and dialysis technicians who have played a key role in the progress made in kidney treatment. Nurses were important members of the early clinical teams who pioneered dialysis treatment. Now renal nursing is an established nursing specialty. Hospital technicians who maintained the early dialysis equipment quickly took up clinical roles, particularly in training patients for dialysis at home.
  • There is an account of the trends and statistics of dialysis treatment in the past and a chapter discussing where dialysis treatment may go in the future.

The first home dialysis machine used in New Zealand Drake Willock 4011 1972

Enquiries to kidneyhistory@gmail.com

 

Advertisements

Send them home

New Zealand is the home of Home Haemodialysis and Christchurch the hub. Sending people home to dialyse is not only more convenient for them and more cost effective, but also has been shown to reduce mortality.  However, is this reduction in mortality sustained across changes in dialysis medicine over time?  This is an important question as Home Haemodialysis is now being considered seriously in many jurisdictions across the world.  The question was recently addressed by Dr Mark Marshall and colleagues across New Zealand and Australia in an article which appeared online ahead of print a couple of weeks back in the American Journal of Kidney Disease (see here, sadly behind a paywall).

What they did

Step 1 was to extract data from 1998 to 2012 from the Australia New Zealand Dialysis & Transplant Registry which prospectively collects information for all long term renal replacement therapy patients. This is a very important registry and the study highlights the importance of keeping data in this way.

Step 2 Placed patients into one of three time periods according to when they started their dialysis: 1998-2002, 2003-2007, 2008-2012.

Step 3: Identified the exposure of the patients to one of: Facility lead haemodialysis (facility HD), Home haemodialysis (home HD), or Peritoneal dialysis (PD).

Step 4: Compared rates of death for patients starting in each time period for each of the dialysis modalities after accounting for age, sex, ethnicity, primary kidney disease, and glomerular filtration rate at the start of therapy (ie how well the kidney was functioning).

What they found (with my commentary)

there is demonstrable survival benefit associated with recent era irrespective of the landmark initiation time.

Indeed, it was a 25% lower (adjusted) mortality for those starting dialysis in  2008-2012 compared to the 1998-2002.

Well done kidney docs – they are getting better and keeping people alive.

There is significant effect modification by modality [type of dialysis] (P <0.001), and separate models were developed in each subgroup: there is a 23% corresponding reduction for those on facility HD therapy, a 29% reduction for those on PD therapy, and a 46% reduction for those on home HD therapy

In other words, all things being equal, survival was improved more on home haemodialysis than either of the other types.

Hazard ratios for death according to era and mode of dialysis.  Lower numbers are better!  From: Marshall, M. R., Polkinghorne, K. R., Kerr, P. G., Agar, J. W. M., Hawley, C. M., & McDonald, S. P. (2015). Temporal Changes in Mortality Risk by Dialysis Modality in the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis Population. American Journal of Kidney Diseases : the Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.03.014

Hazard ratios for death according to era and mode of dialysis. Lower numbers are better! From: Marshall, M. R., Polkinghorne, K. R., Kerr, P. G., Agar, J. W. M., Hawley, C. M., & McDonald, S. P. (2015). Temporal Changes in Mortality Risk by Dialysis Modality in the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis Population. American Journal of Kidney Diseases : the Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.03.014

I note patients were only around 60 years old on average when they first initiated dialysis, yet 37% died before the end of the study period or could receive a transplant.  Folks – do your damnedest to avoid kidney disease – starting with avoiding diabetes.

Conclusions

  1. Survival has increased during the past 15 years
  2. Survival of peritoneal dialysis patients has increased more than facility haemodialysis patients
  3. The relative survival of home haemodialysis patients has improved the most

Has home haemodialysis caused people to survive longer?  This study can’t say, because it is an association study not one set out to demonstrate causation. However, it is evidence that supports the continued use and possibly even expansion of home dialysis in New Zealand and Australia.

For further reading, refer to the paper itself:

Marshall, M. R., Polkinghorne, K. R., Kerr, P. G., Agar, J. W. M., Hawley, C. M., & McDonald, S. P. (2015). Temporal Changes in Mortality Risk by Dialysis Modality in the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis Population. American Journal of Kidney Diseases : the Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.03.014